May Contain Blueberries

the sometimes journal of Jeremy Beker


I have a project at work that is posing a sort of problem for our team. This project, let’s call it project FERRET, has been requested by a rather influential person. This is not a new project, it is making functional changes to an existing system that to a large extent works, albeit clunkily. He has indicated that, in his view, the requirements of the project are rather simple. And if you look at exactly what he wants, he is correct.

The problem arose when we talked to the users of the system and actually looked at the system itself. It is a mess. To really make a system that I could be proud of, it needs a ground up rebuild. Our team has come up with some great ideas that would result in a wonderfully flexible, clean system that would really take the drudgery out of dealing with this data for the people who use the system and let them actually do their jobs instead of paperwork and cutting and pasting. But that will take at least 9-12 months. We don’t have that kind of time.

So we have come up with a short term solution. It isn’t bad, and I am thrilled that one of my teammates came up with it, because I couldn’t think up with a way to cut this project down. I was stuck in my own head with doing it the “right” way.

In the end I hate having a situation where we can either do something that works, but isn’t the best answer in the required time, or do great work that we can be very proud of that will make our team look damn good with a powerful person on campus, but not in the time allotted.

sigh.


Is the sound of the head of every CEO of every flash based mp3 player company exploding.

Apple has joined the fray and no one else has a chance. Ever since the introduction of the iPod other manufacturers have been squeezed down towards the low end of the market. With over 80% of the hard drive based mp3 market cornered, Apple has decided it needs to take over the low end of the market. I almost pity the competitors, they don’t have a chance. Apple - iPod shuffle

In addition, Jobs also announced Apple’s attempt to stop the complaints that Apple doesn’t offer an entry level Mac. The Mac Mini seems to me to be squarely targeted at PC users. It doesn’t come with a monitor, mouse, or keyboard. PC owners can buy this relatively inexpensive ($499) computer, hook it up to their existing peripherals, and they will be all set to experience something they haven’t ever before. Not to mention the fact it is tiny! (6.5 x 6.5 x 2 inches. wow.)

So what does this mean for Apple? I think this is a big move for them. It is the first time in a very long time they are trying to compete on price. Since the return of Steve Jobs to Apple, he has positioned Apple as a high-end niche vendor that produces products that are the epitome of cool. Virtually every television show, movie, and teen idol has an iPod and show it off. Every issue of Wired has a section profiling a famous individual and what’s on their iPod. It has entered the culture. It appears that they are going to capitalize on that now. The perception of Apple has been cool, but I can’t afford it. But now that a whole new range of people can afford Apple products (and their wonderful simplicity and craftsmanship) interesting things will happen

I think this will be good for Apple. I look forward to them succeeding.


![](/images/89.jpg)
We are back!  Back from the nice warm sun to the cold grey twilight of winter.  You can tell I'm thrilled :)  We had a wonderful time.  The boat was nice, our room comfortable, the food scrumptious (and plentiful), the sea beautiful, the islands warm and welcoming.  And the trip was just the right length; we had enough time to relax and enjoy ourselves but were happy it was over at the end.

I am very happy Elizabeth talked me into taking a cruise and I have a feeling I may be more excited about the idea of going on another one than she is.  She did a wonderful job of documenting what we did every day and I expect she will post those at some point, but I can give you a glimpse via pictures.  Well more than a glimpse since we took over 800 of them.  Have fun!

Cruise Photos


I really don’t think most people want to hear what I have to say about the election. Elizabeth and my officemates have already had to endure that. So I will boil down my thoughts. I am truely disgusted by 70% of the people in this country. 30% of people who feel that Bush represents the direction this country should be moving. But far more so by the 40% of people who didn’t even bother to go and make a choice. At least Bush’s 30% believed what they believed (however stupid and misguided I may think it is) and did something about it. I hope that over the next four years I remember to ask anyone I hear complaining about the state of affairs if they voted; and if they didn’t I hope that I am only be moderatly rude to them. But we are we are now, however much I hate it.

So what do we do now?

I wish I knew. I am afraid of what this country will look like in 4 years. I am afraid that it will be changed so fundamentally that it will take decades to fix. I am afraid that an intolerant, past looking majority will continue to impose it’s moral views on me. Basically, I am just afraid. In conversation today, someone made the point that they thought this may be a point that in 30 years we look back on like McCarthyism. I hope we wise up sooner than that.

All we can do now is try to fight the good fight. I was waiting until after the election to make my annual donation to the ACLU. There are important fights that will be waged over the next years, and we can’t give up now. So I’ve made my contribution.

What happens next is really up to all of us. Don’t forget that.


OK, I know this is silly, but hey I want a new Palm that I can use to try some wireless stuff at home. But I sure am not going to actually pay for one. So, if I can get 8 people to sign up for this, I get a free palm. Am I going to do more than ask somewhat sheepishly? No.

Help Jeremy get a new Palmpilot

Updated: OK, nevermind, this is a lot more invasive than I originally thought.


After a long hiatus, William Gibson is blogging again. Apparently he just became so fed up with the current political situation he couldn’t help himself. I realized how much I missed his wit and insight into the world. I’ll leave you with a choice quote

Believing Bush is conservative in any traditional sense is like believing that a Formula One racer with the Perrier logo on its side is full of mineral water.

So go and read. It is good stuff


::sigh:: A real internet connection. At home even! wow.

After a little difficulty this afternoon due to a faulty DSL modem I am all set! Widomaker promptly replaced the faulty unit. This being a prime example of why I am going with Widomaker instead of Verizon. I can’t imagine the pain I would have had to go through with a big faceless company to get the $10 box replaced.

Why DSL? Well I could have gotten a cable modem. It would have been a faster connection, however I would have had to deal with Cox. And that is always bad. Not only that I would have had to share my internet connection with the pimply faced kid down the street who just realized there are naked girls on the internet. So now I have a DSL connection. It is my connection and the only person who I have to share it with is Elizabeth (and she already knows about the naked girls). I have a static IP address and a company I trust. That is worth it.



This from William Gibson’s blog

President Bush goes to an elementary school to talk about the war.

After his talk, he offers to answer questions. One little boy puts up his hand and the president asks him his name.

“I’m Billy, sir.”

“And what’s your question, Billy?”

“I have three questions, sir. Why did the US invade Iraq without the support of the UN? Why are you President when Al Gore got more votes? And whatever happened to Osama Bin Laden?”

Just then the bell rings for recess. Bush announces that they’ll continue after recess.

When they return, Bush asks, “OK, where were we? Question time! Who has a question?”

Another little boy raises his hand. The president asks his name.

“I’m Steve, sir.”

“And what’s your question, Steve?”

“I have five questions, sir. Why did the US invade Iraq without the support of the UN? Why are you President when Al Gore got more votes? Whatever happened to Osama Bin Laden? Why did the recess bell go off twenty minutes early? And what the heck happened to Billy?”


I fault this president for not knowing what death is. He does not suffer the death of our 21-year-olds who wanted to be what they could be. On the eve of D-Day in 1944 General Eisenhower prayed to God for the lives of the young soldiers he knew were going to die. He knew what death was. Even in a justifiable war, a war not of choice but of necessity, a war of survival, the cost was almost more than Eisenhower could bear.

But this president does not know what death is. He hasn’t the mind for it. You see him joking with the press, peering under the table for the weapons of mass destruction he can’t seem to find, you see him at rallies strutting up to the stage in shirt sleeves to the roar of the carefully screened crowd, smiling and waving, triumphal, a he-man.

He does not mourn. He doesn’t understand why he should mourn. He is satisfied during the course of a speech written for him to look solemn for a moment and speak of the brave young Americans who made the ultimate sacrifice for their country.

But you study him, you look into his eyes and know he dissembles an emotion which he does not feel in the depths of his being because he has no capacity for it. He does not feel a personal responsibility for the 1,000 dead young men and women who wanted to be what they could be.

They come to his desk not as youngsters with mothers and fathers or wives and children who will suffer to the end of their days a terribly torn fabric of familial relationships and the inconsolable remembrance of aborted life . . . they come to his desk as a political liability, which is why the press is not permitted to photograph the arrival of their coffins from Iraq.

How then can he mourn? To mourn is to express regret and he regrets nothing. He does not regret that his reason for going to war was, as he knew, unsubstantiated by the facts. He does not regret that his bungled plan for the war’s aftermath has made of his mission-accomplished a disaster. He does not regret that, rather than controlling terrorism, his war in Iraq has licensed it. So he never mourns for the dead and crippled youngsters who have fought this war of his choice.

He wanted to go to war and he did. He had not the mind to perceive the costs of war, or to listen to those who knew those costs. He did not understand that you do not go to war when it is one of the options but when it is the only option; you go not because you want to but because you have to.

Yet this president knew it would be difficult for Americans not to cheer the overthrow of a foreign dictator. He knew that much. This president and his supporters would seem to have a mind for only one thing – to take power, to remain in power, and to use that power for the sake of themselves and their friends.

A war will do that as well as anything. You become a wartime leader. The country gets behind you. Dissent becomes inappropriate. And so he does not drop to his knees, he is not contrite, he does not sit in the church with the grieving parents and wives and children. He is the president who does not feel. He does not feel for the families of the dead, he does not feel for the 35 million of us who live in poverty, he does not feel for the 40 percent who cannot afford health insurance, he does not feel for the miners whose lungs are turning black or for the working people he has deprived of the chance to work overtime at time-and-a-half to pay their bills - it is amazing for how many people in this country this president does not feel.

But he will dissemble feeling. He will say in all sincerity he is relieving the wealthiest 1 percent of the population of their tax burden for the sake of the rest of us, and that he is polluting the air we breathe for the sake of our economy, and that he is decreasing the quality of air in coal mines to save the coal miners’ jobs, and that he is depriving workers of their time-and-a-half benefits for overtime because this is actually a way to honor them by raising them into the professional class.

And this litany of lies he will versify with reverences for God and the flag and democracy, when just what he and his party are doing to our democracy is choking the life out of it.

But there is one more terribly sad thing about all of this. I remember the millions of people here and around the world who marched against the war. It was extraordinary, that spontaneous aroused oversoul of alarm and protest that transcended national borders. Why did it happen? After all, this was not the only war anyone had ever seen coming. There are little wars all over he world most of the time.

But the cry of protest was the appalled understanding of millions of people that America was ceding its role as the last best hope of mankind. It was their perception that the classic archetype of democracy was morphing into a rogue nation. The greatest democratic republic in history was turning its back on the future, using its extraordinary power and standing not to advance the ideal of a concordance of civilizations but to endorse the kind of tribal combat that originated with the Neanderthals, a people, now extinct, who could imagine ensuring their survival by no other means than pre-emptive war.

The president we get is the country we get. With each president the nation is conformed spiritually. He is the artificer of our malleable national soul. He proposes not only the laws but the kinds of lawlessness that govern our lives and invoke our responses. The people he appoints are cast in his image. The trouble they get into and get us into, is his characteristic trouble.

Finally, the media amplify his character into our moral weather report. He becomes the face of our sky, the conditions that prevail. How can we sustain ourselves as the United States of America given the stupid and ineffective warmaking, the constitutionally insensitive lawgiving, and the monarchal economics of this president? He cannot mourn but is a figure of such moral vacancy as to make us mourn for ourselves.